The Clasp by Sloane Crosley These Shallow Graves by Jennifer Donnelly Sofia Khan is Not Obliged by Ayisha Malik

YA Book Club: Allegiant by Veronica Roth [Contains Spoilers]

Monday, November 18, 2013

THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS. THERE'S NO WAY TO TALK ABOUT IT PROPERLY WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT THAT. 


Publisher: HarperCollins Children's Books 
Format: Kindle e-book
Rating: 3/5

Synopsis from Goodreads:
The faction-based society that Tris Prior once believed in is shattered—fractured by violence and power struggles and scarred by loss and betrayal. So when offered a chance to explore the world past the limits she’s known, Tris is ready. Perhaps beyond the fence, she and Tobias will find a simple new life together, free from complicated lies, tangled loyalties, and painful memories.

But Tris’s new reality is even more alarming than the one she left behind. Old discoveries are quickly rendered meaningless. Explosive new truths change the hearts of those she loves. And once again, Tris must battle to comprehend the complexities of human nature—and of herself—while facing impossible choices about courage, allegiance, sacrifice, and love. 
 
Oh dear. I really don't want to write this review but I said (in my head) I would do YA Book Club this month and I like to think I'm a woman of my word. I'd been putting off reading Allegiant anyway because I've been craving good old contemporary YA a lot these days (a craving that was substantially satisfied by Fangirl but I need more!) I also heard about - but tried to avoid - the furore that occured when the book was releasd and people disagreed with the ending. However, I finally dove back into Veronica Roth's world this week and settled down, ready to find out how it all ends. 

My first thought was: dual narration, hmmm ok then. I started to doubt myself thinking it had been a long time since I read Insurgent, maybe that was dual narration too. I checked and was glad to realise I was not going mad because it was not. I usually love dual narration - and I'm not even that hard on writers who make their characters sound similar because hey, they're one step ahead of me being published and all. However, my first thought here was: I don't care what Four thinks. Not in a horrible way - I think he's a great character - it's just, this is Tris' story, isn't it? I found her character to be riveting in Divergent - maybe a little bit iffy in Insurgent - but nonetheless a wonderful, strong, female protagonist. However, with the introduction of Four's voice, Tris' voice became diluted. Her whole character slipped away into the shadows and by the end you could tell she just had nowhere to go, which is why Veronica had to do what she did. Tris died when Four started talking to us. 

Now onto the story as a whole. The world was set up really nicely in Divergent. It was different to the other books I was reading at the time. I even got a little Harry Potter like and sorted myself into a faction (Candor). Overall, the first book was on point, the second book was a little messy but still engaging. However, this one just seemed to flail and then flatline. There was so much potential, so much build up, and then like a firework from your local corner shop (unless you're from East London) it just fizzles out. It got too darn complicated. Too many serums, too many worlds within worlds, too many characters. There was also too much romance. Maybe I don't remember the previous books very well but it always seemed that Tris and Tobias had their thing but that was just filler to the greater story arc. However, this time they went full on Edward and Bella and I just wasn't feeling it. 

However, when we got into the Evelyn/Marcus storyline, I kind of understood why Veronica Roth wanted to use Tobias' voice. Obviously, he would be the only one who truly understood their drive and motivation to act in such a way. The war of the self always makes for an interesting and rich story, so Tobias' battle with his Marcus vs Evelyn genes - his very own nature vs nurture story- was quite fascinating. It made me think that Veronica Roth had fallen in love with Four's story and therefore had to abandon Tris - it happens to us all, doesn't it? The breakout supporting character who suddenly takes over. Had this been Four's story from the beginning, perhaps it would have been a completely different series. Perhaps it would've been stronger. Perhaps we wouldn't have needed the extra serums and extra people. Tris could have still been in it but the story would be more of an inner battle and a family saga. Overall, I think that's what was lost in Allegiant - a focus. Like shattered glass, all the pieces were there for an EPIC end to a brilliant series but it just needed to be fit together properly with some superglue. 

So, what will this mean for the film franchise? I can't see a trilogy now, can you? I mean, Shailene Woodley and Theo James don't look like my Tris and Tobias (for those interested, these are my Tris and Four) but that's fine, Jennifer Lawrence didn't look like Katniss but her acting was superb, rendering looks irrelevant. However, adaptations from solid books are often messy affairs, so an adaptation from a messy book probably won't cut it. Not with such cutthroat fans and critics (speaking of said crazy fans, why can't people just chill out? You can dislike a piece of work without threatening the life of the author. Gordon Bennett, get a grip!)  

So, I hate to say it but I was not down with this series closer at all. It's difficult to end a series - very few can do it well. Remember, Mockingjay? I think that will have the same issues film wise but that's a conversation for another day. Anyway, I will end this review by saying I really admire Veronica Roth, I think she's suuuuuper talented and the overall story is still brilliant but I think the ball was dropped with this one.

11 comments

  1. I've sorted myself into a faction too -- Amity. :-) I've read a lot of reviews similar to yours, ones that voiced disappointment in this conclusion and I totally get why you (and others) have the feelings you do. It's tough to be SO invested in characters and worlds and series only to have them fall apart at the end. I had the same reaction to the series finale of Dexter. Some people thought it was perfect, but it was so NOT the conclusion I had wanted for those characters I'd been rooting on for years. So, yes. I get it. (Also, I'm glad you joined YA Book Club this month... It was fun to visit your blog!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for stopping by Katy!

      Yes- that's exactly it. I don't get too invested in book characters/worlds very often and probably for this reason (television is another story - although I have yet to sample Dexter). It's so difficult to tie things up, particularly in a trilogy. LaineyGossip thought things might've looked different if the series had spanned 6/7 books like Harry Potter, which is an interesting point.

      Delete
  2. I have been totally enamored of Contemps these days! I also loved FANGIRL, so I'll say that I also loved SEA OF TRANQUILITY, WHERE THE STARS STILL SHINE and HOW TO LOVE if that gives you any inspiration for your next read. ;-)

    Great, great thoughts about the dual narration. Even with the Marcus/Evelyn piece I don't think I care about that from Four. Ugh, I'm conflicted about that. He deserves growth and a life, etc. but especially since the voices weren't terribly distinct, I just didn't care for his perspective.

    I did like the romance, but I agree 100% about the too much of everything else. I expected so much more for the beyond-the-fence world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for commenting Kari! I can't even begin to express how much I loved The Sea of Tranquility! I enjoyed Where The Stars Still Shine too but I still have a question about Alex that has been bugging me since I read it. I've not got my hands on How To Love yet, so I'll try and get a copy ASAP.

      Yes, the beyond-the-fence world was more than a bit of an anti climax. I think Veronica Roth needed more time and space (either in terms of length or another instalment) to really bring everything together because the story is there.

      Delete
    2. THE SEA OF TRANQUILITY, my gosh, I just loved it. Probably tied with FANGIRL for a fave of the year for me. I teach junior high and while I'm not IN high school and my students aren't IN high school, either, I thought the voice and characters in all those books I listed was stellar. I've had a good run with the YA/NA Contemps. I think I'll be picking up OCD LOVE STORY next.

      Delete
  3. Your mention of Mockingjay is right on, because this book reminded me A LOT of Mockingjay! Like you, I really enjoyed Divergent. Insurgant was alright but not as great as the first one. And Allegiant was just a big hot mess. The plot line even reminded me of Mockingjay, in that the fearless teens were outside the world they grew up knowing and battling to destroy the world. Divergent was so great, I almost wish it had been a stand alone book. A bad ending to the series tends to drag down the entire thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for commenting Kate! I completely agree - given the brilliance of Divergent, I really thought/hoped the ending would be more original but you're right, it is like Mockingjay. As I said above, trilogies are hard - you have to be extra original AND really tighten the plot lines. Allegiant flailed too much, which is a shame. I'm looking forward to whatever Veronica Roth puts out next though!

      Delete
  4. There was a bit too much romance for me, which is quite possibly something I've never said. But seriously, there were times when the story felt a bit too bogged down by all the romantic stuff, to the point where it started getting annoying.

    I also thought of Mockingjay when I read this :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know! Usually I'm all for the romance but there was something about Tris and Four this time round that didn't work for me.

      Thank you for commenting!

      Delete
  5. Thanks for the honest review. (How fitting, considering you chose Candor.) It's interesting you bring up the dual POV because yours is not the first review I've read that mentions a dislike for the addition of Four's POV. I might be in the minority, but I really liked that. I mean, I get why it was necessary with that ending, but I also thought it helped me better connect to Four. Through Tris's eyes, it always seemed a bit stoic and standoffish. (Though I haven't read either Divergent or Insurgent in a while. This is just how I'm remembering it.) I found it much easier to buy his feelings for Tris when I was inside his head—and that to me made the relationship aspect stronger. I also liked the family aspect, probably because all of that just made Four *more* for me than he had been before.

    I'm glad you joined the YA Book Club this month! It's so fun to have differing opinions on a book, too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it sounds stupid but it only clicked that the dual POV was necessary because of the ending after reading everyone's posts! I agree, the family stuff did help flesh him out, so to speak, and helped to explain his stand-offishness.

      Thank you for commenting Tracey and thank you for picking Allegiant! I'm looking forward to the next YA Book Club read.

      Delete

Thank you for commenting!